To allege that the Modi government is indulging in giving plum postings as quid pro quo is being too generous with creativity.
Nationalism vs Freedom of Expression
Governments can be criticized and should be criticized. But there is a difference between criticizing governments and attacking India. Attacking India is purely anti-national and deserves the harshest punishment.
Read Time: 6 minutes
click play to listen to the article
Nationalism is inspired by the highest ideals of the human race. Satyam (the true), Shivam (the God), Sundaram (the beautiful). Nationalism in India has revived the creative faculties which for centuries had been lying dormant in our people.
– Subhas Chandra Bose
A year back, on 9 February 2016, DSU or Democratic Students Union’s former member Umar Khalid and others organized a protest rally against the hanging of Parliament attack mastermind Afzal Guru and Kashmiri militant Maqbool Bhat. A rally that saw “students” raising horrific slogans like, “Pakistan Zindabad”, “Go India, Go Back”, “Bharat ki barbadi tak jung rahegi, Kashmir ki azaadi tak jung rahegi”, “Afzal hum sharminda hai tere kaatil zinda hai”, “Tum kitne Afzal maaroge, har ghar Afzal niklega”, “Afzal tere khoon se inquilab hoga”, “Bharat tere tukde honge”. Today, a year later, Ramjas college of the Delhi University, in its wisdom, decided to invite Umar Khalid to speak at a seminar. What followed after the ABVP protested this invitation was calibrated and choreographed “protests” by those trying desperately to establish their political relevancy. A video of Gurumehar Kaur, released almost a year back, resurfaced and was made viral. Freedom of Expression has once again become the focus point of discussion due to these incidents.
At a time when the country needs to focus on development, fringe elements with support of left-liberals and morally bankrupt Congress have been seen using student politics to fuel anti-national agendas.
At a time when the country needs to focus on development, fringe elements with support of left-liberals and morally bankrupt Congress have been seen using student politics to fuel anti-national agendas.
Freedom of Expression is a valuable gift of our Constitution, but one must also keep in mind that an individual or institution cannot seek civil liberties without restraint. Barring the dark period of Indira Gandhi’s emergency, India has enjoyed uninterrupted Freedom of Expression since independence. The battle today is surely not for Freedom of Expression. The battle today is between Nationalism and the idea of Freedom of Expression advocated by the Left-Marxist combine who have always sought to overthrow elected governments across the country through armed and educational violence. Left’s romance with anti-national elements is long known and threatens India’s sovereignty.
The left-liberals have also always found support in our Lutyens media. The media in its never-ending quest for TRPs chooses to highlight such issues in dramatic fashion, giving disproportionate coverage to non-existent issues. There have been several instances when the Indian media was seen to be taking positions, obfuscating facts and preferring boisterous histrionics over reality. The selective expression of anguish by many intellectuals is equally distressing and totally unjustified. These left-liberal intellectuals have always tried to badger masses into believing fiction over facts. They have always considered themselves to be the repositories of wisdom and their socio-political agendas has forced them to have predetermined narratives. Placing themselves a class above others, putting themselves on the high pedestal of intellectual elitism, ignoring their own limitless hypocrisy, these liberals have lectured us on the many meanings of nationalism, on the true meaning of patriotism, on how demanding “azaadi” is the Right of Freedom of Expression guaranteed by our Constitution. But a mere glance at the statistics of death of our soldiers reveal the true nature of such slogans.
How can raising anti-national slogans under the veil of Freedom of Expression be a part of national discourse? How can those wishing “Bharat ki barbadi” be made champions of Freedom of Expression? How can those demanding “Kashmir ki azaadi” be made national heroes? There is a fine line between dissent and disintegration and every country has to define and decide what it sees as non-negotiable. For our nation, maintaining our territorial integrity is of utmost importance. Having a sense of our history is paramount for our survival.
What has been happening in some universities across India is nothing less than promoting separatism, a call for violence and secession. The audio-video evidence in public domain, be it of the Hyderabad University, Jadavpur University, JNU or Ramjas college, suggests that the events were not spontaneous but a deliberate attempt to challenge the Constitution of India and create an atmosphere of anarchy.
No one believes that a handful of students screaming “Bharat ki barbadi” represent any majority. What is shameful however is that the protective cover of free speech is being used for propagating violence. What is even more shameful is that political parties like the CPI, CPI(M), Congress etc. use such incidents to indulge in cheap theatrics to score brownie points. There is a clear mischief to bring anarchy. What started from the Hyderabad University to the recent Ramjas College, the purpose is sinister: Disrupt the India Story. Evil minds are at work and students and campuses are being used as launchpads to unleash turmoil, chaos and discontent. We must not allow this to happen. The country must be protected from this lunatic fringe at all costs.
Governments can be criticized and should be criticized. Issues have to be debated and sometimes with a lot of passion. But there is a difference between criticizing governments and attacking India. Attacking India is purely anti-national and deserves the harshest punishment.
Tags: Urban Naxals, Lutyens, Congress, Nation
Share this article:
Leave a Comment
Recommended For You
Nehru's abysmal leadership, marred by a servile attitude toward British interests, a blatant disregard for Maharaja Hari Singh's desperate pleas, and a criminally negligent delay in responding to the Pakistani invasion, inflicted irreversible damage on India. His self-serving actions spawned doubt, separatism, and bloodshed, creating a regrettable and tumultuous legacy →Read More →
On 30 January 1948, the Indian state under Congress decided to punish the Brahmins for no crime of theirs. Devotees of Gandhian Ahimsa were unleashed on innocent Brahmins to perpetrate a political genocide. Congress supported mobs pillaged, burnt and looted the homes of hundreds of innocent Brahmin families. These burning →Read More →
India is in the early days of its most vicious election campaign. While we may see the opposition and its darbaris, just like when the Pulwama attack took place, speaking in one voice, it won’t be long, we’ll see them resorting to questioning and doubting today’s air strikes.
Today, there exists a group of perpetual critics who seem to have mastered the art of opposing every decision made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. For these individuals, their preconceived notions and staunch allegiance to a particular ideology cloud their judgment, rendering them unwilling to objectively assess the merits of →Read More →
Rahul Gandhi’s modus operandi has remained the same — propagating lies, making baseless accusations and spreading false narratives with the intent to tarnish Narendra Modi’s image. But every time he tries doing it, he falls flat on his face.
With the passing of the CAA, stormtroopers in the lutyens media appears to have become the purveyor of inflammatory falsehoods with the sole intention of vilifying Narendra Modi. It then becomes necessary to to draw a distinction between truth and propaganda.
The next time you question Modi’s culpability, you have to remind yourself how easy it is to fall for the causal narrative or made without knowledge of history and reality. The Modi government has single-mindedly been focusing on civilizational revival, governance and capacity building.
In the aftermath of partition, Nehru's catastrophic decisions on Kashmir showcased a stunning lack of foresight and spine. His pathetic reliance on British advice and the premature ceasefire exposed a feeble leader prioritizing personal agendas over national interests. Nehru's betrayal of minority concerns, particularly the callous dismissal of Kashmiri Pandits, →Read More →
शेतकऱ्यांच्या हिताच्या बुरख्याआड भारतात अशांती पसरवण्याचे हे नवीन कारस्थान आहे हे उघड उघड दिसते. ह्या मध्ये भारतातीलच काही लोक पण आनंदाने सहभागी होत आहेत. हे आपले दुर्दैव आहे.