Rahul Gandhi has the habit of making fabricated allegations beyond facts. There are several instances, besides him lying, where Rahul Gandhi has chosen to willingly undermine India’s sovereignty.
Rahul Gandhi: The Pinocchio of Indian Politics
Part 2: The Habitual Offender
Rahul Gandhi has the habit of making fabricated allegations beyond facts. There are several instances, besides him lying, where Rahul Gandhi has chosen to willingly undermine India’s sovereignty.
Read Time: 10 minutes
click play to listen to the article
Rahul Gandhi has the habit of making fabricated allegations beyond facts. There are several instances, besides him lying, where Rahul Gandhi has chosen to willingly undermine India’s sovereignty.
Mir Jafar of the New India: A commander in the Bengal army under Siraj ud-Daulah, Mir Jafar had betrayed the nawab during the 1757 Battle of Plassey, which eventually paved the way for British rule in India. In his Euro 2023 Trip, speaking to a foreign audience and that too in a country which ruled India for 150 years, Rahul Gandhi made remarks that democracy in India was under threat and that India’s minorities and the press were being attacked by BJP under Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Then he went on to cross the laxman-rekha by expressing his displeasure at the European Union and the United States for not subscribing to his viewpoint and urged these foreign nations to interfere in our nation’s internal matters — indirectly suggesting them to help the Congress party win elections and anoint him as the crown prince. It is pertinent to remember that earlier, Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar had asked Pakistan to bestow a similar favor.
Seeking foreign interference in the internal affairs of the country erodes India’s image on the world map. Such appeals do not behoove any parliamentarian, let alone someone seeking to become the Prime Minister. Today, India is asserting itself as a deft world player with increasing success. In this context, Rahul Gandhi’s remarks damaged India’s image at a time when world leaders are visiting India for G-20 meetings.
Democracy in Danger: The practice of selective amnesia is a time-tested technique used by Congress scion Rahul Gandhi. When words drop from Rahul Gandhi’s dynastic lips, the Indian voter who, for more than half a century, had entrusted his bloodline to govern the political apparatus of this ancient civilization, feels scared. This scary quotient is further heightened when he speaks about the Indian Constitution, that singularly has been the victim of unbelievable vandalism and hammering at the hands of his “Iron Lady” grandmother. Congress’ fortunes under Rahul Gandhi might be at peril, but India’s democracy is alive, well and kicking. It is not Narendra Modi, but Rahul Gandhi’s grandmother Indira Gandhi who threatened India’s democracy during the Emergency, when the Constitution was suspended and the Supreme Court rendered impotent; it was his grandmother Indira Gandhi who invoked Article 356 fifty times to suspend and dismiss legitimately elected non-Congress state governments — Rahul Gandhi should do well to remember this the next time he opens his mouth to speak about democracy and Constitution.
It was because of Rahul Gandhi’s great-grandfather, Jawaharlal Nehru, that Majrooh Sultanpuri was jailed for writing a poem against Nehru; Mark Robson’s fictional film on the assassination of MK Gandhi, “Nine Hours to Rama” was banned as it exposed security lapses that led to Bapu’s murder; VS Naipaul’s travelogue during Nehru’s times, “An area of Darkness” was banned; Alexander Campbell’s, “The Heart of India” was banned for being “repulsive” as it exposed the working of Indian bureaucracy under Congress; Kurt Frischler’s book, “Ayesha” was banned; Bertrand Russel’s, “Unarmed Victory” was banned as it showed India’s political masters during the India-China 1962 war in poor light; Mrinal Sen’s, “Neel Akasher Neechey” was banned for it showcased the social-economic abyss under Nehru; English weekly, “Organizer” was censored for being critical of the Nehru government; Nathuram Godse’s testimony was banned; President Rajendra Prasad speech was barred from distribution — Rahul Gandhi should do well to remember this the next time he opens his mouth to speak about democracy and Constitution.
There is every reason to believe that Rahul Gandhi’s knowledge of the Constitution and democracy such as it is, comes from his dense association with JNU-style far-Left radicals and his quid pro quos with the global NGO network innately hostile to India. After faking “antar-aatma ki awaaz” as the reason behind declining the Prime Minster post in 2004, Sonia Gandhi formed her own kitchen cabinet, became a super PM and went on to form an extra-constitutional ‘National Advisory Council’ to control the Manmohan Singh government. The NAC members who enjoyed the status of cabinet ministers without any accountability came from a wide spectrum — they were associated with Church funded NGOs, were Islamists and often terror apologists as well. Crown prince Rahul Gandhi himself tore an ordinance brought by the UPA government at a press conference — Rahul Gandhi should do well to remember this the next time he opens his mouth to speak about democracy and Constitution.
The same guy who stood behind the slogan ‘Bharat tere tukde honge’ now talks of democracy, Constitution and “Bharat Jodo”. Irony has just committed hara-kiri. Rahul Gandhi’s and Congress’ actions have left them little room for taking the moral high ground. To pose, again and again, as the savior of the country, is not in accordance with the facts.
Undermining India for the Love of China: Rahul Gandhi — by design or by accident — represents a challenge to India’s sovereignty and integrity. He has consistently taken positions that undermine our national interests. In his Euro 2023 trip, Rahul Gandhi was seen drooling over China and denigrating India on foreign soil. The Congress scion heaped praises on China as his presentation slide noted the country as an ‘aspiring superpower’ and a ‘force of nature’. Rahul Gandhi argues that the Chinese value “harmony”, and hails its Belt and Road Initiative — which goes through the illegally occupied Indian territory of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir — as a visionary step.
When a major stand-off between Indian soldiers and Chinese PLA was taking place in Doklam, and the Chinese government-controlled media was making provocative statements against India, Rahul Gandhi, without even notifying the Indian government, headed towards Chanakyapuri-based Chinese embassy to talk to Chinese envoy Luo Zhaohui. The party first denied that Rahul met the Chinese ambassador, only hours later to confirm that the meeting did take place. What mandate did Rahul Gandhi have to talk to a foreign envoy? His meeting the envoy shows his utter disregard for the country’s established norms and values and exposes him as a mindless autocratic spoiled brat.
In his love for China, Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party cross all boundaries. In 2008, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between the then ruling Congress and the Communist Party of China for a mechanism that would help regular high-level exchanges between them. The deal was signed during party chief Sonia Gandhi’s visit to Beijing. The Congress has till date not published the details of the MoU. It is also a well-known fact that the Congress party affiliated Rajiv Gandhi Foundation took donations from China. Further, despite video evidence to the contrary, Rahul Gandhi mocks Indian soldiers by saying that Indian soldiers were beaten by the Chinese during the Tawang face-off.
Why so much love for China? Is the Gandhi family trying to pay off its debts for the donations they took from them?
Insulting Swatantryaveer Savarkar: It is perhaps not Rahul Gandhi’s fault alone that he inherited the legacy of insulting India’s heroes. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress has repeatedly insulted Veer Savarkar by calling him — traitor, maafiveer, servant of the British etc.
During the freedom struggle, Veer Savarkar was sentenced to life imprisonment and sent to Andaman by the British. Veer Savarkar went through months of solitary confinement; was made to stand with his hands cuffed above for long periods; restrained in chains and flogged; tied to the mill, he was made to extract oil all day, while being denied even basic access to toilets or water; was often forced to eat rotten food infested with worms and insects. Despite this prolonged torture, the only thought in the mind of Veer Savarkar was to free the country of British Raj.
Veer Savarkar sacrificed his life and family for freedom that people enjoy today. On the contrary, Jawaharlal Nehru was given a luxurious cell all to himself — with an armchair, desk, rocking chair, and window. Nehru never faced the same cruelty which Veer Savarkar faced. Rahul Gandhi, who calls Veer Savarkar as maafiveer, should remember the lineage he comes from pleaded with the Viceroy for his son, Jawaharlal Nehru, to be released from his luxurious cell. Before insulting India’s heroes, Rahul Gandhi should remember his Italian lineage who took 15 years after marrying Rajiv Gandhi to even apply for Indian citizenship.
Share this article:
Leave a Comment
Recommended For You
HMV, His Master’s Voice points towards an ecosystem which creates narratives for their political masters — leaders of Sharad Pawar’s NCP. The HMVs have a single-point agenda: to discredit Devendra Fadnavis at every forum, regional and national.
The next time you question Modi’s culpability, you have to remind yourself how easy it is to fall for the causal narrative or made without knowledge of history and reality. The Modi government has single-mindedly been focusing on civilizational revival, governance and capacity building.
The Congress and its Lutyens cabal do not for a moment think before tarnishing India’s image — for, for them, removing Modi and plunging India back to the old corrupt political continuum is the only mode of survival.
The protest against converting Sammed Shikharji into a tourist destination must also start a debate that enables restoration of sanctity of India's sacred spaces.
Governments can be criticized and should be criticized. But there is a difference between criticizing governments and attacking India. Attacking India is purely anti-national and deserves the harshest punishment.
On one hand Rahul Gandhi is talking about Bharat Jodo, on the other, his party has gone after RSS by posting inciteful messages. By claiming that India was never a nation and by pitching non-BJP ruled states against the center, Rahul Gandhi is trying to create a divide in the →
India is in the early days of its most vicious election campaign. While we may see the opposition and its darbaris, just like when the Pulwama attack took place, speaking in one voice, it won’t be long, we’ll see them resorting to questioning and doubting today’s air strikes.
The rejection of invitations for Prabhu Shri Ram's Pranpratishtha ceremony at Ayodhya Dham by members of the I.N.D.I alliance is not unexpected. Their animosity towards Sanatan Dharma has been evident on numerous occasions. An article outlining instances where they have disparaged, insulted, and defamed the Sanatan tradition.
The deceitful fabrication of narratives, like the one we are seeing on Aarey, to stall critical development projects is not just hurting India’s growth story but harming honest environment concerns as well.